
		<paper>
			<loc>https://jjcit.org/paper/104</loc>
			<title>SENTIMENT ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF ARAB JORDANIAN FACEBOOK COMMENTS FOR JORDANIAN TELECOM COMPANIES USING LEXICON-BASED APPROACH AND MACHINE LEARNING</title>
			<doi>10.5455/jjcit.71-1586289399</doi>
			<authors>Khalid M.O. Nahar,Amerah Jaradat,Mohammed Salem Atoum,Firas Ibrahim</authors>
			<keywords>Jordan Telecom,Sentiment analysis,Lexicon-based,Polarity,Facebook comments,Machine learning,NLP</keywords>
			<citation>48</citation>
			<views>7741</views>
			<downloads>1916</downloads>
			<received_date>7-Apr.-2020</received_date>
			<revised_date>  6-Jun.-2020</revised_date>
			<accepted_date>  8-Jun.-2020</accepted_date>
			<abstract>Sentiment Analysis (SA) is a technique used for identifying the polarity (positive, negative) of a given text, using 
Natural  Language  Processing  (NLP)  techniques.  Facebook  is  an  example  of  a  social  media  platform  that  is 
widely used among people living in Jordan to express their opinions regarding public and special focus areas. In 
this  paper, we implemented  the  lexicon-based  approach  for  identifying  the  polarity  of  the  provided  Facebook 
comments.  The data  samples  are  from  local  Jordanian  people  commenting  on  a  public  issue  related  to  the 
services  provided  by  the  main  telecommunication  companies  in  Jordan  (Zain,  Orange and Umniah).  The 
produced results regarding the evaluated Arabic sentiment lexicon were promising. By applying the user-defined 
lexicon  based  on  the  common  Facebook  posts  and  comments  used  by  Jordanians,  it  scored (60%) positive  and 
(40%) negative.  The  general lexicon accuracy  was  (98%).  The  lexicon  was  used  to  label  a  set  of  unlabeled 
Facebook  comments  to  formulate  a  big  dataset.  Using  supervised  Machine  Learning  (ML)  algorithms  that  are 
usually used in polarity classification, the researchers introduced them to our formulated dataset. The results of 
the  classification  were  97.8, 96.8 and 95.6% for  Support  Vector  Machine  (SVM),  K-Nearest  Neighbour  (K-NN) 
and Naïve Bayes (NB) classifiers, respectively.</abstract>
		</paper>


